linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 5.3-rc1 and later

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        arnd@...db.de, huw@...eweavers.com, andre.przywara@....com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, will.deacon@....com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
        salyzyn@...roid.com, paul.burton@...s.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, 0x7f454c46@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, pcc@...gle.com, sthotton@...vell.com,
        shuah@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Regression in 5.3-rc1 and later

On Fri, 23 Aug 2019, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:40:50AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 11:36:54AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > To everyone on the long Cc list...
> > > 
> > > What's happening with this?  I was about to merge the patches for 32-bit
> > > ARM, which I don't want to do if doing so will cause this regression on
> > > 32-bit ARM as well.
> > 
> > tglx fixed it:
> > 
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1908221257580.1983@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
> > 
> > which I assume is getting routed as a fix via -tip.
> 
> Right, so Chris reported the issue to everyone involved.  Tglx's
> reply severely trimmed the Cc list so folk like me had no idea what
> was going on, removing even the mailing lists.  On the face of it,
> it looks like an intentional attempt to cut people out of the loop
> who really should've been kept in the loop.  Yea, that's just great.

Sorry that was no intentional attempt to cut anyone out of the
loop. Trimmed it too agressively without applying much brain.

Thanks,

	tglx