[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uFM0JLqJ7y9F8ybvYx+o4+2S+guaV-MaBQyyik3F0vNiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:15:37 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kernel.h: Add non_block_start/end()
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:06 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:42:47PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > I'm assuming the lockdep one will land, so not going to resend that.
>
> I was assuming you'd wake the might_lock_nested() along with the i915
> user through the i915/drm tree. If want me to take some or all of that,
> lemme know.
might_lock_nested() is a different patch series, that one will indeed
go in through the drm/i915 tree, thx for the ack there. What I meant
here is some mmu notifier lockdep map in this series that Jason said
he's going to pick up into hmm.git. I'm doing about 3 or 4 different
lockdep annotations series in parallel right now :-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists