[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190823151832.14427-1-vidyas@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:48:32 +0530
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To: <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>
CC: <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kthota@...dia.com>,
<mmaddireddy@...dia.com>, <vidyas@...dia.com>, <sagar.tv@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Don't print an error on -EPROBE_DEFER
APIs like devm_regulator_get() and devm_phy_get() have the potential to
return -EPROBE_DEFER when the respective sub-systems are not ready yet.
So avoid printing an error message as .probe() will be tried out again
at a later point of time anyway.
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
index fc0dbeb31d78..c730986ed34d 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
@@ -1368,9 +1368,11 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pcie->pex_ctl_supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vddio-pex-ctl");
if (IS_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply)) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n",
- PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply));
- return PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulator: %ld\n",
+ PTR_ERR(pcie->pex_ctl_supply));
+ return ret;
}
pcie->core_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "core");
@@ -1412,7 +1414,8 @@ static int tegra_pcie_dw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
kfree(name);
if (IS_ERR(phys[i])) {
ret = PTR_ERR(phys[i]);
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PHY: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists