linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] firmware: add offset to request_firmware_into

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Aug 2019 12:44:42 -0700
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] firmware: add offset to request_firmware_into_buf

Hi Takashi,

Thanks for review.  comments below.

On 2019-08-23 3:05 a.m., Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 21:24:46 +0200,
> Scott Branden wrote:
>> Add offset to request_firmware_into_buf to allow for portions
>> of firmware file to be read into a buffer.  Necessary where firmware
>> needs to be loaded in portions from file in memory constrained systems.
> AFAIU, this won't work with the fallback user helper, right?
Seems to work fine in the fw_run_tests.sh with fallbacks.
> Also it won't work for the compressed firmware files as-is.
Although unnecessary, seems to work fine in the fw_run_tests.sh with 
"both" and "xzonly" options.
>
> So this new API usage is for the limited use cases, hence it needs
> such checks and returns error/warns if the condition isn't met.
>
> IOW, this can't be a simple extension of request_firmware_into_buf()
> to pass a new flag.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi