[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190823144549.58dce8e7@x1.home>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:45:49 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: hexin <hexin.op@...il.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hexin <hexin15@...du.com>,
Liu Qi <liuqi16@...du.com>, Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vfio_pci: Restore original state on release
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 11:35:19 +0800
hexin <hexin.op@...il.com> wrote:
> vfio_pci_enable() saves the device's initial configuration information
> with the intent that it is restored in vfio_pci_disable(). However,
> the commit referenced in Fixes: below replaced the call to
> __pci_reset_function_locked(), which is not wrapped in a state save
> and restore, with pci_try_reset_function(), which overwrites the
> restored device state with the current state before applying it to the
> device. Reinstate use of __pci_reset_function_locked() to return to
> the desired behavior.
>
> Fixes: 890ed578df82 ("vfio-pci: Use pci "try" reset interface")
> Signed-off-by: hexin <hexin15@...du.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Qi <liuqi16@...du.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@...du.com>
> ---
Applied to vfio next branch for v5.4. Thanks,
Alex
> v2->v3:
> - change commit log
> v1->v2:
> - add fixes tag
> - add comment to warn
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1565926427-21675-1-git-send-email-hexin15@baidu.com
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1566042663-16694-1-git-send-email-hexin15@baidu.com
>
> drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> index 703948c..0220616 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> @@ -438,11 +438,20 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> pci_write_config_word(pdev, PCI_COMMAND, PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE);
>
> /*
> - * Try to reset the device. The success of this is dependent on
> - * being able to lock the device, which is not always possible.
> + * Try to get the locks ourselves to prevent a deadlock. The
> + * success of this is dependent on being able to lock the device,
> + * which is not always possible.
> + * We can not use the "try" reset interface here, which will
> + * overwrite the previously restored configuration information.
> */
> - if (vdev->reset_works && !pci_try_reset_function(pdev))
> - vdev->needs_reset = false;
> + if (vdev->reset_works && pci_cfg_access_trylock(pdev)) {
> + if (device_trylock(&pdev->dev)) {
> + if (!__pci_reset_function_locked(pdev))
> + vdev->needs_reset = false;
> + device_unlock(&pdev->dev);
> + }
> + pci_cfg_access_unlock(pdev);
> + }
>
> pci_restore_state(pdev);
> out:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists