lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190824125612.zq5qsay2wv62wykt@core.my.home>
Date:   Sat, 24 Aug 2019 14:56:12 +0200
From:   Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
To:     Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH v2 0/3] Add basic support for RTC on
 Allwinner H6 SoC

Hi,

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 10:06:14AM +0200, Jernej Škrabec wrote:
> Dne sobota, 24. avgust 2019 ob 10:04:24 CEST je Jernej Škrabec napisal(a):
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Dne torek, 20. avgust 2019 ob 17:19:31 CEST je megous@...ous.com napisal(a):
> > > From: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
> > > 
> > > I went through the datasheets for H6 and H5, and compared the differences.
> > > RTCs are largely similar, but not entirely compatible. Incompatibilities
> > > are in details not yet implemented by the rtc driver though.
> > > 
> > > I also corrected the clock tree in H6 DTSI.
> > > 
> > > This patchset is necessary for implementing the WiFi/Bluetooth support
> > > on boards using H6 SoC.
> > > 
> > > There was some discussion previously of describing HOSC, DCXO and XO
> > > oscillators and clocks as part of RTC in DT, but I decided against it
> > > because it's not necessary, becuse information that would be provided
> > > as a part of DT can already be determined at runtime from RTC registers,
> > > so this woudn't add any value and would only introduce complications
> > > to the driver. See: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10898083/
> > > 
> > > Please take a look.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thank you and regards,
> > > 
> > >   Ondrej Jirman
> > 
> > Sorry for a bit late test, but with your patches on Tanix TX6 box I get this
> > in dmesg:
> > 
> > [   17.431742] sun6i-rtc 7000000.rtc: Failed to set rtc time.
> > [   20.439742] sun6i-rtc 7000000.rtc: rtc is still busy.
> > [   21.435744] sun6i-rtc 7000000.rtc: rtc is still busy.
> > [   24.055741] sun6i-rtc 7000000.rtc: rtc is still busy.
> > [   24.439752] sun6i-rtc 7000000.rtc: rtc is still busy.
> > 
> > Last line is repeated non-stop.
> > 
> > Any idea what could be wrong?
> 
> Additional info - this is on kernel 5.2.6 with your patches applied.

Do you have schematics, or a FEX file for the board or any other info on how the
RTC is set up on that board?

Can you dump the RTC register range?

regards,
	o.

> Best regards,
> Jernej
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ