[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190824135339.46da90b968d92529641b3ed2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2019 13:53:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] vmstats/vmevents flushing
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 00:33:51 +0000 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 04:27:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:00:51 -0700 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
> >
> > > v3:
> > > 1) rearranged patches [2/3] and [3/3] to make [1/2] and [2/2] suitable
> > > for stable backporting
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > 1) fixed !CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM build by moving memcg_flush_percpu_vmstats()
> > > and memcg_flush_percpu_vmevents() out of CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
> > > 2) merged add-comments-to-slab-enums-definition patch in
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Roman Gushchin (3):
> > > mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmstats before releasing memcg
> > > mm: memcontrol: flush percpu vmevents before releasing memcg
> > > mm: memcontrol: flush percpu slab vmstats on kmem offlining
> > >
> >
> > Can you please explain why the first two patches were cc:stable but not
> > the third?
> >
> >
>
> Because [1] and [2] are fixing commit 42a300353577 ("mm: memcontrol: fix
> recursive statistics correctness & scalabilty"), which has been merged into 5.2.
>
> And [3] fixes commit fb2f2b0adb98 ("mm: memcg/slab: reparent memcg kmem_caches
> on cgroup removal"), which is in not yet released 5.3, so stable backport isn't
> required.
OK, thanks. Patches 1 & 2 are good to go but I don't think that #3 has
had suitable review and I have a note here that Michal has concerns
with it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists