linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: process: fix broken link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 24 Aug 2019 15:18:08 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Jacob Huisman <jacobhuisman@...nelthusiast.com>
Cc:     Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>,
        Harry Wei <harryxiyou@...il.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: process: fix broken link

On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:22:09 +0100
Jacob Huisman <jacobhuisman@...nelthusiast.com> wrote:

> http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html seems to be down since
> approximately September 2018. There is a working archive copy on
> arhive.org. Replaced the links in documenation + translations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Huisman <jacobhuisman@...nelthusiast.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/process/howto.rst                                 | 2 +-
>  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst                    | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/howto.rst              | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/it_IT/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/ja_JP/SubmittingPatches              | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/ja_JP/howto.rst                      | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/ko_KR/howto.rst                      | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/howto.rst              | 2 +-
>  Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/submitting-patches.rst | 2 +-
>  9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Dead links don't help anybody, so I've applied this.  I have to wonder,
though, whether there is really value in carrying around a link to a page
that hasn't been maintained in years.  Almost everything that appears
there is already in submitting-patches.rst; maybe we could see if there's
anything that's missing, add it, then drop the link?

Thanks,

jon