[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd5caa4e0b49932b331ef405606bd344d474d911.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 20:05:20 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@...com, pjt@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, morten.rasmussen@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper
On Fri, 2019-08-23 at 20:13 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>
>
> > @@ -1668,7 +1668,7 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct
> > task_numa_env *env,
> > /*
> > * In the overloaded case, try and keep the load balanced.
> > */
> > - load = task_h_load(env->p) - task_h_load(cur);
> > + load = task_se_h_load(env->p->se) - task_se_h_load(cur->se);
>
> Shouldn't this be:
>
> load = task_se_h_load(&env->p->se) - task_se_h_load(&cur->se);
Yes indeed. Sorry I forgot to fix these after you
pointed them out last time.
They are now fixed in my tree.
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists