| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190824013425.175645-13-brendanhiggins@google.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:34:19 -0700
From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To: frowand.list@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, keescook@...gle.com,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com, mcgrof@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, robh@...nel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
shuah@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com, Tim.Bird@...y.com,
amir73il@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
jdike@...toit.com, joel@....id.au, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
khilman@...libre.com, knut.omang@...cle.com, logang@...tatee.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, pmladek@...e.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
richard@....at, rientjes@...gle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
wfg@...ux.intel.com, Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@...il.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v15 12/18] kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources
From: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@...il.com>
Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources
(struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up
at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed
resources.
Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
---
kunit/test-test.c | 228 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 228 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kunit/test-test.c b/kunit/test-test.c
index e0ab4bd546ea..5ebe059d16e2 100644
--- a/kunit/test-test.c
+++ b/kunit/test-test.c
@@ -101,3 +101,231 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = {
.test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases,
};
kunit_test_suite(kunit_try_catch_test_suite);
+
+/*
+ * Context for testing test managed resources
+ * is_resource_initialized is used to test arbitrary resources
+ */
+struct kunit_test_resource_context {
+ struct kunit test;
+ bool is_resource_initialized;
+ int allocate_order[2];
+ int free_order[2];
+};
+
+static int fake_resource_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
+
+ res->allocation = &ctx->is_resource_initialized;
+ ctx->is_resource_initialized = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void fake_resource_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
+{
+ bool *is_resource_initialized = res->allocation;
+
+ *is_resource_initialized = false;
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_init_resources(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+
+ kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "testing_test_init_test");
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct kunit_resource *res;
+ kunit_resource_free_t free = fake_resource_free;
+
+ res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
+ fake_resource_init,
+ fake_resource_free,
+ GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctx);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, res);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test,
+ &ctx->is_resource_initialized,
+ (bool *) res->allocation);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_last(&res->node, &ctx->test.resources));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, free, res->free);
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct kunit_resource *res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(
+ &ctx->test,
+ fake_resource_init,
+ fake_resource_free,
+ GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctx);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test,
+ kunit_resource_destroy(&ctx->test,
+ kunit_resource_instance_match,
+ res->free,
+ res->allocation));
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx->is_resource_initialized);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+ struct kunit_resource *resources[5];
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(resources); i++) {
+ resources[i] = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
+ fake_resource_init,
+ fake_resource_free,
+ GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctx);
+ }
+
+ kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_mark_order(int order_array[],
+ size_t order_size,
+ int key)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < order_size && order_array[i]; i++)
+ ;
+
+ order_array[i] = key;
+}
+
+#define KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, order_field, key) \
+ kunit_resource_test_mark_order(ctx->order_field, \
+ ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->order_field), \
+ key)
+
+static int fake_resource_2_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
+
+ KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 2);
+
+ res->allocation = ctx;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void fake_resource_2_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->allocation;
+
+ KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 2);
+}
+
+static int fake_resource_1_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
+
+ kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
+ fake_resource_2_init,
+ fake_resource_2_free,
+ GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctx);
+
+ KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 1);
+
+ res->allocation = ctx;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void fake_resource_1_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->allocation;
+
+ KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * TODO(brendanhiggins@...gle.com): replace the arrays that keep track of the
+ * order of allocation and freeing with strict mocks using the IN_SEQUENCE macro
+ * to assert allocation and freeing order when the feature becomes available.
+ */
+static void kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+
+ /* fake_resource_1 allocates a fake_resource_2 in its init. */
+ kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
+ fake_resource_1_init,
+ fake_resource_1_free,
+ GFP_KERNEL,
+ ctx);
+
+ /*
+ * Since fake_resource_2_init calls KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER
+ * before returning to fake_resource_1_init, it should be the first to
+ * put its key in the allocate_order array.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[0], 2);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[1], 1);
+
+ kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
+
+ /*
+ * Because fake_resource_2 finishes allocation before fake_resource_1,
+ * fake_resource_1 should be freed first since it could depend on
+ * fake_resource_2.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[0], 1);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[1], 2);
+}
+
+static int kunit_resource_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx =
+ kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+
+ test->priv = ctx;
+
+ kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "test_test_context");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void kunit_resource_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
+
+ kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
+ kfree(ctx);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case kunit_resource_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_init_resources),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
+ .name = "kunit-resource-test",
+ .init = kunit_resource_test_init,
+ .exit = kunit_resource_test_exit,
+ .test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(kunit_resource_test_suite);
--
2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists