[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190825193218.GD20639@zn.tnic>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 21:32:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pu Wen <puwen@...on.cn>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for 5.3-rc5
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 11:38:50AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 11:29 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > My lazy, sticky Sunday brain could come up only with this:
>
> Looks reasonable, except I think this only runs at boot, right?
>
> I _think_ the boot CPU is magical during suspend/resume, and doesn't
> do the full CPU bringup.
>
> Although I guess this would still report it for the other CPU's? I
> didn't check if this gets done during CPU bringup of secondary CPU's.
So after adding a dump_stack() at the beginning of this function (yap,
I'm lazy) I see during boot:
[ 0.230044] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc5+ #9
[ 0.230759] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-1 04/01/2014
[ 0.231690] Call Trace:
[ 0.232097] dump_stack+0x46/0x60
[ 0.232496] x86_init_rdrand+0xf/0xa1
[ 0.232496] identify_cpu+0x352/0x540
[ 0.232496] identify_boot_cpu+0xc/0x8f
[ 0.232496] check_bugs+0x28/0x8e4
[ 0.232496] ? __get_locked_pte+0x13e/0x1f0
[ 0.232496] start_kernel+0x4ae/0x4ca
and also on all the remaining 15 CPUs of the guest. Then, suspending to
RAM and resuming right afterwards says:
[ 51.620230] Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 51.622745] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
[ 51.627264] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
[ 51.630581] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
[ 51.634533] smpboot: CPU 4 is now offline
[ 51.638715] smpboot: CPU 5 is now offline
[ 51.642590] smpboot: CPU 6 is now offline
[ 51.645890] smpboot: CPU 7 is now offline
[ 51.649076] smpboot: CPU 8 is now offline
[ 51.652362] smpboot: CPU 9 is now offline
[ 51.655647] smpboot: CPU 10 is now offline
[ 51.659061] smpboot: CPU 11 is now offline
[ 51.662772] smpboot: CPU 12 is now offline
[ 51.665863] smpboot: CPU 13 is now offline
[ 51.667980] smpboot: CPU 14 is now offline
[ 51.671644] smpboot: CPU 15 is now offline
[ 51.675640] ACPI: Low-level resume complete
[ 51.675640] PM: Restoring platform NVS memory
[ 51.675640] Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
[ 51.728674] x86: Booting SMP configuration:
[ 51.729015] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x1
[ 51.625362] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc5+ #9
[ 51.625362] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.1-1 04/01/2014
[ 51.625362] Call Trace:
[ 51.625362] dump_stack+0x46/0x60
[ 51.625362] x86_init_rdrand+0xf/0xa1
[ 51.625362] identify_cpu+0x352/0x540
[ 51.625362] identify_secondary_cpu+0x13/0x80
[ 51.625362] smp_store_cpu_info+0x45/0x50
[ 51.625362] start_secondary+0x4f/0x180
[ 51.625362] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
[ 51.740833] CPU1 is up
...
and the remaining 14(!). Yes, this doesn't run on the BSP during resume.
I think the better thing to do would be to stick this in a CPUHP
notifier...
Btw:
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
...
<puwen@...on.cn>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
name=spam01.hygon.cn type=AAAA: Host found but no data record of requested
type
hygon.cn domain doesn't even resolve from here. Oh boy.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 247165, AG München
Powered by blists - more mailing lists