[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826070633.GB11331@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:06:33 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, hch@....de, wahrenst@....net,
marc.zyngier@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, phill@...pberryi.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, will@...nel.org, eric@...olt.net,
mbrugger@...e.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] arm64: edit zone_dma_bits to fine tune
dma-direct min mask
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:58:18PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
> arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_dma_phys();
> + zone_dma_bits = ilog2((arm64_dma_phys_limit - 1) & GENMASK_ULL(31, 0)) + 1;
This adds a way too long line. I also find the use of GENMASK_ULL
horribly obsfucating, but I know that opinion is't shared by everyone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists