linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: add arch/riscv/Kbuild

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190826113526.GA23425@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 04:35:26 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: add arch/riscv/Kbuild

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 06:26:58PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Use the standard obj-y form to specify the sub-directories under
> arch/riscv/. No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>

Do you have a document what the grand scheme here is?  Less of the magic
in arch/$(ARCH)/Makefile sounds like a good idea, but unless we have
a very specific split between the kbuild makefile and various override
I fear just splitting things up into two files doesn't really help much.