| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpOj8g+eY-vTxW4Sk+wVYTP1-4jDJB=nE=24eSubBvN-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:39:06 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@...com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] mmc: mmci: add hardware busy timeout feature
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 12:00, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.Barre@...com> wrote:
>
> From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
>
> In some variants, the data timer starts and decrements
> when the DPSM enters in Wait_R or Busy state
> (while data transfer or MMC_RSP_BUSY), and generates a
> data timeout error if the counter reach 0.
I don't quite follow here, sorry. Can you please try to elaborate on
the use case(s) more exactly?
For example, what happens when a data transfer has just finished (for
example when MCI_DATAEND has been received) and we are going to send a
CMD12 to stop it? In this case the CMD12 has the MMC_RSP_BUSY flag
set.
Another example is the CMD5, which has no data with it.
>
> -Define max_busy_timeout (in ms) according to clock.
> -Set data timer register if the command has rsp_busy flag.
> If busy_timeout is not defined by framework, the busy
> length after Data Burst is defined as 1 second
> (refer: 4.6.2.2 Write of sd specification part1 v6-0).
One second is not sufficient for all operations, like ERASE for
example. However, I understand that you want to pick some value, as a
safety. I guess that's fine.
I am thinking that if the command has the MMC_RSP_BUSY flag set, the
core should really provide a busy timeout for it. That said, maybe the
host driver should splat a WARN in case there is not busy timeout
specified.
> -Add MCI_DATATIMEOUT error management in mmci_cmd_irq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> index c37e70dbe250..c50586540765 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
> @@ -1075,6 +1075,7 @@ static void
> mmci_start_command(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, u32 c)
> {
> void __iomem *base = host->base;
> + unsigned long long clks = 0;
>
> dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "op %02x arg %08x flags %08x\n",
> cmd->opcode, cmd->arg, cmd->flags);
> @@ -1097,6 +1098,19 @@ mmci_start_command(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, u32 c)
> else
> c |= host->variant->cmdreg_srsp;
> }
> +
> + if (host->variant->busy_timeout && !host->mrq->data) {
Suppose this is a CMD12 command, having the MMC_RSP_BUSY flag set. The
command would then be sent to stop the transmission and then
host->mrq->data would also be set.
If I recall earlier what you stated about the new sdmmc variant, the
CMD12 is needed to exit the DPSM. Hence don't you need to re-program a
new value for the MMCIDATATIMER register for this scenario?
> + if (cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY) {
> + if (!cmd->busy_timeout)
> + cmd->busy_timeout = 1000;
> +
> + clks = (unsigned long long)cmd->busy_timeout;
> + clks *= host->cclk;
Any problems with putting the above on one line?
> + do_div(clks, MSEC_PER_SEC);
> + }
> + writel_relaxed(clks, host->base + MMCIDATATIMER);
This is writing zero to MMCIDATATIMER in case the MMC_RSP_BUSY isn't
set, is that on purpose?
> + }
> +
> if (/*interrupt*/0)
> c |= MCI_CPSM_INTERRUPT;
>
> @@ -1203,6 +1217,7 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
> {
> void __iomem *base = host->base;
> bool sbc, busy_resp;
> + u32 err_msk;
>
> if (!cmd)
> return;
> @@ -1215,8 +1230,12 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
> * handling. Note that we tag on any latent IRQs postponed
> * due to waiting for busy status.
> */
> - if (!((status|host->busy_status) &
> - (MCI_CMDCRCFAIL|MCI_CMDTIMEOUT|MCI_CMDSENT|MCI_CMDRESPEND)))
> + err_msk = MCI_CMDCRCFAIL | MCI_CMDTIMEOUT;
You might as well move the initial assignment of err_msk to the its
declaration above.
> + if (host->variant->busy_timeout && busy_resp)
> + err_msk |= MCI_DATATIMEOUT;
> +
> + if (!((status | host->busy_status) &
> + (err_msk | MCI_CMDSENT | MCI_CMDRESPEND)))
> return;
>
> /* Handle busy detection on DAT0 if the variant supports it. */
> @@ -1235,8 +1254,7 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
> * while, to allow it to be set, but tests indicates that it
> * isn't needed.
> */
> - if (!host->busy_status &&
> - !(status & (MCI_CMDCRCFAIL|MCI_CMDTIMEOUT)) &&
> + if (!host->busy_status && !(status & err_msk) &&
> (readl(base + MMCISTATUS) & host->variant->busy_detect_flag)) {
>
> writel(readl(base + MMCIMASK0) |
> @@ -1290,6 +1308,9 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
> cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> } else if (status & MCI_CMDCRCFAIL && cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_CRC) {
> cmd->error = -EILSEQ;
> + } else if (host->variant->busy_timeout && busy_resp &&
> + status & MCI_DATATIMEOUT) {
> + cmd->error = -ETIMEDOUT;
> } else {
> cmd->resp[0] = readl(base + MMCIRESPONSE0);
> cmd->resp[1] = readl(base + MMCIRESPONSE1);
> @@ -1948,6 +1969,8 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
> * Enable busy detection.
> */
> if (variant->busy_detect) {
> + u32 max_busy_timeout = 0;
> +
> mmci_ops.card_busy = mmci_card_busy;
> /*
> * Not all variants have a flag to enable busy detection
> @@ -1957,7 +1980,11 @@ static int mmci_probe(struct amba_device *dev,
> mmci_write_datactrlreg(host,
> host->variant->busy_dpsm_flag);
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
> - mmc->max_busy_timeout = 0;
> +
> + if (variant->busy_timeout)
> + max_busy_timeout = ~0UL / (mmc->f_max / MSEC_PER_SEC);
It looks like the max busy timeout is depending on the current picked
clock rate, right?
In such case, perhaps it's better to update mmc->max_busy_timeout as
part of the ->set_ios() callback, as it's from there the clock rate
gets updated. Or what do you think?
> +
> + mmc->max_busy_timeout = max_busy_timeout;
> }
>
> /* Prepare a CMD12 - needed to clear the DPSM on some variants. */
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> index 833236ecb31e..d8b7f6774e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.h
> @@ -287,6 +287,8 @@ struct mmci_host;
> * @signal_direction: input/out direction of bus signals can be indicated
> * @pwrreg_clkgate: MMCIPOWER register must be used to gate the clock
> * @busy_detect: true if the variant supports busy detection on DAT0.
> + * @busy_timeout: true if the variant starts data timer when the DPSM
> + * enter in Wait_R or Busy state.
> * @busy_dpsm_flag: bitmask enabling busy detection in the DPSM
> * @busy_detect_flag: bitmask identifying the bit in the MMCISTATUS register
> * indicating that the card is busy
> @@ -333,6 +335,7 @@ struct variant_data {
> u8 signal_direction:1;
> u8 pwrreg_clkgate:1;
> u8 busy_detect:1;
> + u8 busy_timeout:1;
> u32 busy_dpsm_flag;
> u32 busy_detect_flag;
> u32 busy_detect_mask;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists