[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826120821.16351-20-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:09:07 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>, <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
<vigneshr@...com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 19/20] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce
spi_nor_get_flash_info()
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
Dedicate a function for getting the pointer to the flash_info
const struct. Trim a bit the spi_nor_scan() huge function.
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
---
v3: no changes
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
index d13317d1f372..ec70b58294ec 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
@@ -4766,10 +4766,50 @@ static int spi_nor_set_addr_width(struct spi_nor *nor)
return 0;
}
+static const struct flash_info *spi_nor_get_flash_info(struct spi_nor *nor,
+ const char *name)
+{
+ const struct flash_info *info = NULL;
+
+ if (name)
+ info = spi_nor_match_id(name);
+ /* Try to auto-detect if chip name wasn't specified or not found */
+ if (!info)
+ info = spi_nor_read_id(nor);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info))
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+ /*
+ * If caller has specified name of flash model that can normally be
+ * detected using JEDEC, let's verify it.
+ */
+ if (name && info->id_len) {
+ const struct flash_info *jinfo;
+
+ jinfo = spi_nor_read_id(nor);
+ if (IS_ERR(jinfo)) {
+ return jinfo;
+ } else if (jinfo != info) {
+ /*
+ * JEDEC knows better, so overwrite platform ID. We
+ * can't trust partitions any longer, but we'll let
+ * mtd apply them anyway, since some partitions may be
+ * marked read-only, and we don't want to lose that
+ * information, even if it's not 100% accurate.
+ */
+ dev_warn(nor->dev, "found %s, expected %s\n",
+ jinfo->name, info->name);
+ info = jinfo;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return info;
+}
+
int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
const struct spi_nor_hwcaps *hwcaps)
{
- const struct flash_info *info = NULL;
+ const struct flash_info *info;
struct device *dev = nor->dev;
struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
struct device_node *np = spi_nor_get_flash_node(nor);
@@ -4800,37 +4840,9 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name,
if (!nor->bouncebuf)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (name)
- info = spi_nor_match_id(name);
- /* Try to auto-detect if chip name wasn't specified or not found */
- if (!info)
- info = spi_nor_read_id(nor);
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(info))
- return -ENOENT;
-
- /*
- * If caller has specified name of flash model that can normally be
- * detected using JEDEC, let's verify it.
- */
- if (name && info->id_len) {
- const struct flash_info *jinfo;
-
- jinfo = spi_nor_read_id(nor);
- if (IS_ERR(jinfo)) {
- return PTR_ERR(jinfo);
- } else if (jinfo != info) {
- /*
- * JEDEC knows better, so overwrite platform ID. We
- * can't trust partitions any longer, but we'll let
- * mtd apply them anyway, since some partitions may be
- * marked read-only, and we don't want to lose that
- * information, even if it's not 100% accurate.
- */
- dev_warn(dev, "found %s, expected %s\n",
- jinfo->name, info->name);
- info = jinfo;
- }
- }
+ info = spi_nor_get_flash_info(nor, name);
+ if (IS_ERR(info))
+ return PTR_ERR(info);
nor->info = info;
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists