lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOLK0pyk0z2DodvdP46XD7GrDUHmiRBehs8FT2u7iWes-bLtuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:31:59 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <lantianyu1986@...il.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r kernel org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        michael.h.kelley@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/Hyper-V: Fix build error with CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE=N

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 1:52 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:39:46AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >lantianyu1986@...il.com writes:
> >
> >> From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> >>
> >> Both Hyper-V tsc page and Hyper-V tsc MSR code use variable
> >> hv_sched_clock_offset for their sched clock callback and so
> >> define the variable regardless of CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE setting.
> >
> >CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE is gone after my "x86/hyper-v: enable TSC page
> >clocksource on 32bit" patch. Do we still have an issue to fix?
>
> Yes. Let's get it fixed on older kernels (as such we need to tag this
> one for stable). The 32bit TSC patch won't come in before 5.4 anyway.
>
> Vitaly, does can you ack this patch? It might require you to re-spin
> your patch.
>
Hi Sasha:
               Thomas has foled this fix into original patch.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/23/600
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ