[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826140651.GA19381@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:06:51 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Don't update RIP or do single-step on faulting
emulation
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:46:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:55 PM Sean Christopherson
> <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Don't advance RIP or inject a single-step #DB if emulation signals a
> > fault. This logic applies to all state updates that are conditional on
> > clean retirement of the emulation instruction, e.g. updating RFLAGS was
> > previously handled by commit 38827dbd3fb85 ("KVM: x86: Do not update
> > EFLAGS on faulting emulation").
> >
> > Not advancing RIP is likely a nop, i.e. ctxt->eip isn't updated with
> > ctxt->_eip until emulation "retires" anyways. Skipping #DB injection
> > fixes a bug reported by Andy Lutomirski where a #UD on SYSCALL due to
> > invalid state with RFLAGS.RF=1 would loop indefinitely due to emulation
>
> EFLAGS.TF=1
It's always some mundane detail...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists