linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] coresight: Add barrier packet when moving offset forward

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 08:59:46 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] coresight: Add barrier packet when moving offset forward

Hi Yabin,

On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:30, Yabin Cui <yabinc@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for fixing this problem. I didn't realize it because I usually use a
> buffer size >= the default ETR buffer size, which is harder to reproduce the
> problem.
> The patches LGTM, maybe you also want to fix the problem commented by Leo Yan.

I will look into the issue reported by Leo later today.

> I tested the patches by recording etm data with a buffer size smaller than the
> default ETR buffer size. Then I saw barrier packets when decoding with OpenCSD.
> And I could decode successfully without error message.

Can I add your Tested-by ?