[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826151512.GX26807@tuxbook-pro>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 08:15:12 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: qcom-qmp: Correct ready status, again
On Tue 20 Aug 17:23 PDT 2019, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On 06/08/19 9:20 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [This is an automated email]
> >
> > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> > fixing commit: 885bd765963b phy: qcom-qmp: Correct READY_STATUS poll break condition.
> >
> > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.6.
> >
> > v5.2.6: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> > 520602640419 ("phy: qcom-qmp: Raise qcom_qmp_phy_enable() polling delay")
> >
> >
> > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
> >
> > How should we proceed with this patch?
>
> Merging of this patch got delayed. Bjorn, Is it okay if this patch gets merged
> in the next merge window and backported to stable releases then?
>
That's fine, thanks for picking it up Kishon
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists