[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826161929.GB2680@u1904>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 09:19:31 -0700
From: mark gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, pjt@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, keescook@...omium.org, kerrnel@...gle.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] stop_machine: Fix stop_cpus_in_progress
ordering
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 08:36:37PM +0000, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Make sure the entire for loop has stop_cpus_in_progress set.
It is not clear how this commit comment matches the change. Please explain
how adding 2 barrier's makes sure stop_cpus_in_progress is set for the entier
for loop.
--mark
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
> kernel/stop_machine.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> index 067cb83f37ea..583119e0c51c 100644
> --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> @@ -375,6 +375,7 @@ static bool queue_stop_cpus_work(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> */
> preempt_disable();
> stop_cpus_in_progress = true;
> + barrier();
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
> work = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper.stop_work, cpu);
> work->fn = fn;
> @@ -383,6 +384,7 @@ static bool queue_stop_cpus_work(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
> if (cpu_stop_queue_work(cpu, work))
> queued = true;
> }
> + barrier();
> stop_cpus_in_progress = false;
> preempt_enable();
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists