lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826051340.GA26785@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:13:40 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Henry Burns <henrywolfeburns@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Henry Burns <henryburns@...gle.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] mm/zsmalloc.c: Fix race condition in
 zs_destroy_pool

On (08/23/19 04:10), Henry Burns wrote:
> > Thanks.  So we have a couple of races which result in memory leaks?  Do
> > we feel this is serious enough to justify a -stable backport of the
> > fixes?
> 
> In this case a memory leak could lead to an eventual crash if
> compaction hits the leaked page. I don't know what a -stable
> backport entails, but this crash would only occur if people are
> changing their zswap backend at runtime
> (which eventually starts destruction).

Well, zram/zsmalloc is not only for swapping, but it's also a virtual
block device which can be created or destroyed dynamically. So it looks
like a potential -stable material.

Minchan?

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ