[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190826194538.GB14309@lenoir>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:45:39 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 28/38] posix-cpu-timers: Restructure expiry array
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:22:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Now that the abused struct task_cputime is gone, it's more natural to
> bundle the expiry cache and the list head of each clock into a struct and
> have an array of those structs.
>
> Follow the hrtimer naming convention of 'bases' and rename the expiry cache
> to 'nextevt' and adapt all usage sites.
>
> Generates also better code .text size shrinks by 80 bytes.
>
> Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> V2: New patch
> V3: Address review feedback from Frederic
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists