linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190826.141338.1571164902049647689.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     andrew@...n.ch
Cc:     horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, allan.nielsen@...rochip.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add NETIF_F_HW_BR_CAP feature

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:38:11 +0200

> I'm still not convinced this is needed. The model is, the hardware is
> there to accelerate what Linux can do in software. Any peculiarities
> of the accelerator should be hidden in the driver.  If the accelerator
> can do its job without needing promisc mode, do that in the driver.

I completely agree.