lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190826223047.13146-1-ahs3@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:30:47 -0600
From:   Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
To:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ACPI / CPPC: do not require the _PSD method when using CPPC

According to the ACPI 6.3 specification, the _PSD method is optional
when using CPPC.  The underlying assumption is that each CPU can change
frequency independently from all other CPUs; _PSD is provided to tell
the OS that some processors can NOT do that.

However, the acpi_get_psd() function returns ENODEV if there is no _PSD
method present, or an ACPI error status if an error occurs when evaluating
_PSD, if present.  This makes _PSD mandatory when using CPPC, in violation
of the specification, and only on Linux.

This has forced some firmware writers to provide a dummy _PSD, even though
it is irrelevant, but only because Linux requires it; other OSPMs follow
the spec.  We really do not want to have OS specific ACPI tables, though.

So, correct acpi_get_psd() so that it does not return an error if there
is no _PSD method present, but does return a failure when the method can
not be executed properly.  This allows _PSD to be optional as it should
be.

v2:
   -- verified simple check for AE_NOT_FOUND was sufficient
   -- simplified return status check per Rafael's suggestion

Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 15f103d7532b..7a946f1944ab 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -365,10 +365,12 @@ static int acpi_get_psd(struct cpc_desc *cpc_ptr, acpi_handle handle)
 	union acpi_object  *psd = NULL;
 	struct acpi_psd_package *pdomain;
 
-	status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, "_PSD", NULL, &buffer,
-			ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_PSD")) {
+		status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, "_PSD", NULL,
+						    &buffer, ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE);
+		if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)	/* _PSD is optional */
+			return 0;
+	}
 
 	psd = buffer.pointer;
 	if (!psd || psd->package.count != 1) {
-- 
2.21.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ