linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi+tpm: Don't access event->count when it isn't mapped.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190827134155.otm6ekeb53siy6lb@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:41:55 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Cc:     Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
        Bartosz Szczepanek <bsz@...ihalf.com>,
        Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi+tpm: Don't access event->count when it isn't
 mapped.

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Jarkko, these two should probably go to 5.3 if possible - I
> > independently had a report of a system hitting this issue last week
> > (Intel apparently put a surprising amount of data in the event logs on
> > the NUCs).
> 
> OK, I can try to push them. I'll do PR today.

Ard, how do you wish these to be managed?

I'm asking this because:

1. Neither patch was CC'd to linux-integrity.
2. Neither patch has your tags ATM.

/Jarkko