lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908271633450.1939@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:42:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Ming Lei wrote:
> +/*
> + * Update average irq interval with the Exponential Weighted Moving
> + * Average(EWMA)
> + */
> +static void irq_update_interval(void)
> +{
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT	128
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR	127
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR	(IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT - \
> +		IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR)

Please do not stick defines into a function body. That's horrible.

> +
> +	int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> +	struct irq_interval *inter = per_cpu_ptr(&avg_irq_interval, cpu);
> +	u64 delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - inter->last_irq_end;

Why are you doing that raw_smp_processor_id() dance? The call site has
interrupts and preemption disabled.

Also how is that supposed to work when sched_clock is jiffies based?

> +	inter->avg = (inter->avg * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR +
> +		delta * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR) /
> +		IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT;

We definitely are not going to have a 64bit multiplication and division on
every interrupt. Asided of that this breaks 32bit builds all over the place.

Thanks,

	tglx




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ