[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908271633450.1939@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:42:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] softirq: implement IRQ flood detection mechanism
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Ming Lei wrote:
> +/*
> + * Update average irq interval with the Exponential Weighted Moving
> + * Average(EWMA)
> + */
> +static void irq_update_interval(void)
> +{
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT 128
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR 127
> +#define IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR (IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT - \
> + IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR)
Please do not stick defines into a function body. That's horrible.
> +
> + int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> + struct irq_interval *inter = per_cpu_ptr(&avg_irq_interval, cpu);
> + u64 delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - inter->last_irq_end;
Why are you doing that raw_smp_processor_id() dance? The call site has
interrupts and preemption disabled.
Also how is that supposed to work when sched_clock is jiffies based?
> + inter->avg = (inter->avg * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_PREV_FACTOR +
> + delta * IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_CURR_FACTOR) /
> + IRQ_INTERVAL_EWMA_WEIGHT;
We definitely are not going to have a 64bit multiplication and division on
every interrupt. Asided of that this breaks 32bit builds all over the place.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists