[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15c5d9f6-6429-4775-05af-8a956d44a9ef@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:03:20 +0100
From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Sebastian Mayr <me@....st>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: get_unmapped_area && in_ia32_syscall (Was: [PATCH] uprobes/x86:
fix detection of 32-bit user mode)
Hi Oleg,
On 8/27/19 3:00 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
[..]
> But to remind, there is another problem with in_ia32_syscall() && uprobes.
>
> get_unmapped_area() paths use in_ia32_syscall() and this is wrong in case
> when the caller is xol_add_vma(), in this case TS_COMPAT won't be set.>
> Usually the addr = TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE passed to get_unmapped_area() should
> work, mm->get_unmapped_area() won't be even called. But if this addr is already
> occupied get_area() can return addr > TASK_SIZE.
Technically, it's not bigger than TASK_SIZE that's supplied
get_unmapped_area() as an argument..
[..]
> if (!area->vaddr) {
> + if(!is_64bit_mm(mm))
> + current_thread_info()->status |= TS_COMPAT;
> /* Try to map as high as possible, this is only a hint. */
> area->vaddr = get_unmapped_area(NULL, TASK_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE,
> PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0);
> + if(!is_64bit_mm(mm))
> + current_thread_info()->status &= ~TS_COMPAT;;
> if (area->vaddr & ~PAGE_MASK) {
> ret = area->vaddr;
> goto fail;
It could have been TASK_SIZE_OF(), but that would be not much better in
my POV. I see that arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() uses is_64bit_mm() which
is correct the majority of time, but not for processes those jump
switching CS.. Except criu afair there are at least wine, dosemu.
I had it in my TODO to fix this :)
Do I read the code properly and xol is always one page?
Could that page be reserved on the top of mmap_base/mmap_compat_base at
the binfmt loading time? (I would need than to add .mremap() for
restoring sake). Probably, not reserving it if personality doesn't allow
randomization or providing a way to disable it..
Thanks,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists