[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af5fdfc3-dbc8-40fc-2893-c786670f28d4@electromag.com.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:55:07 +0800
From: Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu, linux@...ck-us.net,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@...h-aachen.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] iio: adc: ina2xx: Use label proper for device
identification
On 26/08/2019 02:07, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:12:00 +0200
> Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21. 08. 19 4:11, Phil Reid wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2019 22:11, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Add support for using label property for easier device identification via
>>>> iio framework.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
>>>> index 7c7c63677bf4..077c54915f70 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
>>>> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static int ina2xx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>>> snprintf(chip->name, sizeof(chip->name), "%s-%s",
>>>> client->name, dev_name(&client->dev));
>>>> - indio_dev->name = chip->name;
>>>> + indio_dev->name = of_get_property(np, "label", NULL) ? : chip->name;
>>>> indio_dev->setup_ops = &ina2xx_setup_ops;
>>>> buffer = devm_iio_kfifo_allocate(&indio_dev->dev);
>>>>
>>> I like this personally. It'd be nice if it was a core function so
>>> it could be an opt in to any iio device.
>>>
>>> Don't know how well received that'd be thou.
>>>
> I'm not particularly keen on changing the semantics of existing
> ABI, but how about adding new ABI to provide this?
>
> /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio\:device0/label for example?
>
> I haven't thought about it in depth yet though. If you spin
> a patch with that and the DT docs we'll be more likely to get
> a view from DT maintainers if this is acceptable use of label.
>
I've sent "iio: core: Add optional symbolic label to device attributes"
for further discussion.
> Thanks
>
> Jonathan
>
>>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>> index 524a686077ca..d21b495d36a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>> @@ -1647,6 +1647,9 @@ int __iio_device_register(struct iio_dev
>> *indio_dev, struct module *this_mod)
>> if (!indio_dev->dev.of_node && indio_dev->dev.parent)
>> indio_dev->dev.of_node = indio_dev->dev.parent->of_node;
>>
>> + indio_dev->name = of_get_property(indio_dev->dev.of_node,
>> "label", NULL) ? :
>> + indio_dev->name;
>> +
>> ret = iio_check_unique_scan_index(indio_dev);
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>>
>> M
>
>
>
--
Regards
Phil Reid
ElectroMagnetic Imaging Technology Pty Ltd
Development of Geophysical Instrumentation & Software
www.electromag.com.au
3 The Avenue, Midland WA 6056, AUSTRALIA
Ph: +61 8 9250 8100
Fax: +61 8 9250 7100
Email: preid@...ctromag.com.au
Powered by blists - more mailing lists