lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1ce2e69-d93a-93e8-8bbf-07c27e52124f@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 21:18:37 +0200
From:   Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>
To:     Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Amadeusz Sławiński 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ASoC: Intel: Fix use of potentially uninitialized
 variable

On 2019-08-27 16:17, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> From: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>
> 
> If ipc->ops.reply_msg_match is NULL, we may end up using uninitialized
> mask value.
> 
> reported by smatch:
> sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c:266 sst_ipc_reply_find_msg() error: uninitialized symbol 'mask'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@...el.com>
> ---
>   sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c
> index 1186a03a88d6..6068bb697e22 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/common/sst-ipc.c
> @@ -223,6 +223,8 @@ struct ipc_message *sst_ipc_reply_find_msg(struct sst_generic_ipc *ipc,
>   
>   	if (ipc->ops.reply_msg_match != NULL)
>   		header = ipc->ops.reply_msg_match(header, &mask);
> +	else
> +		mask = (u64)-1;

Please see linux/limits.h and check if this can't be replaced by an 
equivalent found there.

>   
>   	if (list_empty(&ipc->rx_list)) {
>   		dev_err(ipc->dev, "error: rx list empty but received 0x%llx\n",
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ