[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmEZ6ADQyquRYmr+uNFXyZ0wpBZxNCrQnn8qaRZADzjRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 16:25:16 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: silence -Woverride-init/initializer-overrides
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:49 AM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>
> When compiling a kernel with W=1, there are several of those warnings
> due to arm64 override a field by purpose. Just disable those warnings
> for both GCC and Clang of this file, so it will help dig "gems" hidden
> in the W=1 warnings by reducing some noises.
>
> mm/init-mm.c:39:2: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization
> of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides]
> INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h:133:9: note: expanded from macro
> 'INIT_MM_CONTEXT'
> .pgd = init_pg_dir,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~
> mm/init-mm.c:30:10: note: previous initialization is here
> .pgd = swapper_pg_dir,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Note: there is a side project trying to support explicitly allowing
> specific initializer overrides in Clang, but there is no guarantee it
> will happen or not.
>
> https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/639
>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
> ---
> mm/Makefile | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile
> index d0b295c3b764..5a30b8ecdc55 100644
> --- a/mm/Makefile
> +++ b/mm/Makefile
Hi Qian, thanks for the patch.
Rather than disable the warning outright, and bury the disabling in a
directory specific Makefile, why not move it to W=2 in
scripts/Makefile.extrawarn?
I think even better would be to use pragma's to disable the warning in
mm/init.c. Looks like __diag support was never ported for clang yet
from include/linux/compiler-gcc.h to include/linux/compiler-clang.h.
Then you could do:
28 struct mm_struct init_mm = {
29 .mm_rb = RB_ROOT,
30 .pgd = swapper_pg_dir,
31 .mm_users = ATOMIC_INIT(2),
32 .mm_count = ATOMIC_INIT(1),
33 .mmap_sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(init_mm.mmap_sem),
34 .page_table_lock =
__SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.page_table_lock),
35 .arg_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_mm.arg_lock),
36 .mmlist = LIST_HEAD_INIT(init_mm.mmlist),
37 .user_ns = &init_user_ns,
38 .cpu_bitmap = { [BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)] = 0},
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore(CLANG, 4, "-Winitializer-overrides")
39 INIT_MM_CONTEXT(init_mm)
__diag_pop();
40 };
I mean, the arm64 case is not a bug, but I worry about turning this
warning off. I'd expect it to only warn once during an arm64 build,
so does the warning really detract from "W=1 gem finding?"
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ KCOV_INSTRUMENT_memcontrol.o := n
> KCOV_INSTRUMENT_mmzone.o := n
> KCOV_INSTRUMENT_vmstat.o := n
>
> +CFLAGS_init-mm.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, override-init)
-Woverride-init isn't mentioned in the commit message, so not sure if
it's meant to ride along?
> +CFLAGS_init-mm.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, initializer-overrides)
> +
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists