[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190827062844.GQ7538@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:28:44 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>
Cc: alastair@...ilva.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Perform a bounds check in arch_add_memory
On Tue 27-08-19 15:20:46, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
>
> It is possible for firmware to allocate memory ranges outside
> the range of physical memory that we support (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS).
Doesn't that count as a FW bug? Do you have any evidence of that in the
field? Just wondering...
> This patch adds a bounds check to ensure that any hotplugged
> memory is addressable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index 9191a66b3bc5..de18fb73de30 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ int __ref arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> int rc;
>
> + if ((start + size - 1) >> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size());
>
> start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
> --
> 2.21.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists