lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190827072242.GT7538@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:22:42 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: don't hide potentially null memmap pointer in
 sparse_remove_section

On Tue 27-08-19 17:00:16, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
[...]
> The NULL check was added in commit:
> 95a4774d055c ("memory-hotplug: update mce_bad_pages when removing the
> memory")
> where memmap was originally inited to NULL, and only conditionally
> given a value.
> 
> With this in mind, since that situation is no longer true, I think we
> could instead drop the NULL check.

This would be much more preferable to the original patch.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ