linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.2 102/162] block, bfq: handle NULL return value by bfq_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190827072741.819216658@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:50:30 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 102/162] block, bfq: handle NULL return value by bfq_init_rq()

[ Upstream commit fd03177c33b287c6541f4048f1d67b7b45a1abc9 ]

As reported in [1], the call bfq_init_rq(rq) may return NULL in case
of OOM (in particular, if rq->elv.icq is NULL because memory
allocation failed in failed in ioc_create_icq()).

This commit handles this circumstance.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/22/824

Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>
Cc: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Reported-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 404e776aa36d0..b528710364e9e 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2085,9 +2085,14 @@ static void bfq_request_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 	    blk_rq_pos(container_of(rb_prev(&req->rb_node),
 				    struct request, rb_node))) {
 		struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(req);
-		struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqq->bfqd;
+		struct bfq_data *bfqd;
 		struct request *prev, *next_rq;
 
+		if (!bfqq)
+			return;
+
+		bfqd = bfqq->bfqd;
+
 		/* Reposition request in its sort_list */
 		elv_rb_del(&bfqq->sort_list, req);
 		elv_rb_add(&bfqq->sort_list, req);
@@ -2134,6 +2139,9 @@ static void bfq_requests_merged(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
 	struct bfq_queue *bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq),
 		*next_bfqq = bfq_init_rq(next);
 
+	if (!bfqq)
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * If next and rq belong to the same bfq_queue and next is older
 	 * than rq, then reposition rq in the fifo (by substituting next
@@ -5061,12 +5069,12 @@ static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
 	bfqq = bfq_init_rq(rq);
-	if (at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) {
+	if (!bfqq || at_head || blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq)) {
 		if (at_head)
 			list_add(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch);
 		else
 			list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &bfqd->dispatch);
-	} else { /* bfqq is assumed to be non null here */
+	} else {
 		idle_timer_disabled = __bfq_insert_request(bfqd, rq);
 		/*
 		 * Update bfqq, because, if a queue merge has occurred
-- 
2.20.1