linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 81/98] dm zoned: improve error handling in reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190827072722.318146854@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:51:00 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@....com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 81/98] dm zoned: improve error handling in reclaim

From: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@....com>

commit b234c6d7a703661b5045c5bf569b7c99d2edbf88 upstream.

There are several places in reclaim code where errors are not
propagated to the main function, dmz_reclaim(). This function
is responsible for unlocking zones that might be still locked
at the end of any failed reclaim iterations. As the result,
some device zones may be left permanently locked for reclaim,
degrading target's capability to reclaim zones.

This patch fixes these issues as follows -

Make sure that dmz_reclaim_buf(), dmz_reclaim_seq_data() and
dmz_reclaim_rnd_data() return error codes to the caller.

dmz_reclaim() function is renamed to dmz_do_reclaim() to avoid
clashing with "struct dmz_reclaim" and is modified to return the
error to the caller.

dmz_get_zone_for_reclaim() now returns an error instead of NULL
pointer and reclaim code checks for that error.

Error logging/debug messages are added where necessary.

Fixes: 3b1a94c88b79 ("dm zoned: drive-managed zoned block device target")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomichev@....com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c |    4 ++--
 drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c  |   28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ static struct dm_zone *dmz_get_rnd_zone_
 	struct dm_zone *zone;
 
 	if (list_empty(&zmd->map_rnd_list))
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 
 	list_for_each_entry(zone, &zmd->map_rnd_list, link) {
 		if (dmz_is_buf(zone))
@@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ static struct dm_zone *dmz_get_rnd_zone_
 			return dzone;
 	}
 
-	return NULL;
+	return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
 }
 
 /*
--- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-reclaim.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int dmz_reclaim_buf(struct dmz_re
 
 	dmz_unlock_flush(zmd);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static int dmz_reclaim_seq_data(struct d
 
 	dmz_unlock_flush(zmd);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int dmz_reclaim_rnd_data(struct d
 
 	dmz_unlock_flush(zmd);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void dmz_reclaim_empty(struct dmz
 /*
  * Find a candidate zone for reclaim and process it.
  */
-static void dmz_reclaim(struct dmz_reclaim *zrc)
+static int dmz_do_reclaim(struct dmz_reclaim *zrc)
 {
 	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = zrc->metadata;
 	struct dm_zone *dzone;
@@ -344,8 +344,8 @@ static void dmz_reclaim(struct dmz_recla
 
 	/* Get a data zone */
 	dzone = dmz_get_zone_for_reclaim(zmd);
-	if (!dzone)
-		return;
+	if (IS_ERR(dzone))
+		return PTR_ERR(dzone);
 
 	start = jiffies;
 
@@ -391,13 +391,20 @@ static void dmz_reclaim(struct dmz_recla
 out:
 	if (ret) {
 		dmz_unlock_zone_reclaim(dzone);
-		return;
+		return ret;
 	}
 
-	(void) dmz_flush_metadata(zrc->metadata);
+	ret = dmz_flush_metadata(zrc->metadata);
+	if (ret) {
+		dmz_dev_debug(zrc->dev,
+			      "Metadata flush for zone %u failed, err %d\n",
+			      dmz_id(zmd, rzone), ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	dmz_dev_debug(zrc->dev, "Reclaimed zone %u in %u ms",
 		      dmz_id(zmd, rzone), jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - start));
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -442,6 +449,7 @@ static void dmz_reclaim_work(struct work
 	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = zrc->metadata;
 	unsigned int nr_rnd, nr_unmap_rnd;
 	unsigned int p_unmap_rnd;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!dmz_should_reclaim(zrc)) {
 		mod_delayed_work(zrc->wq, &zrc->work, DMZ_IDLE_PERIOD);
@@ -471,7 +479,9 @@ static void dmz_reclaim_work(struct work
 		      (dmz_target_idle(zrc) ? "Idle" : "Busy"),
 		      p_unmap_rnd, nr_unmap_rnd, nr_rnd);
 
-	dmz_reclaim(zrc);
+	ret = dmz_do_reclaim(zrc);
+	if (ret)
+		dmz_dev_debug(zrc->dev, "Reclaim error %d\n", ret);
 
 	dmz_schedule_reclaim(zrc);
 }