linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dwc: PCI: intel: Intel PCIe RC controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:14:11 +0800
From:   Dilip Kota <eswara.kota@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     "Chuan Hua, Lei" <chuanhua.lei@...ux.intel.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
        hch@...radead.org, jingoohan1@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dwc: PCI: intel: Intel PCIe RC controller driver


On 8/27/2019 4:14 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> second example: pcie-tegra194 (only in -next, will be part of v5.4)
>    struct tegra_pcie_dw {
>      ...
>      struct dw_pcie pci;
>      ...
>    };
>
> so some drivers store a pointer pointer to the dw_pcie struct vs.
> embedding the dw_pcie struct directly.
> as far as I know the result will be equal, except that you don't have
> to use a second devm_kzalloc for struct dw_pcie (and thus reducing
> memory fragmentation).
Okay, i will change it to "struct dw_pcie pci;"

Thanks for the feedback.

Regards,

Dilip