[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c33f6829-b1f4-376f-5e12-38c811c370dd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 12:04:03 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, CK HU <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
Daoyuan Huang <daoyuan.huang@...iatek.com>,
Jiaguang Zhang <jiaguang.zhang@...iatek.com>,
Dennis-YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
Houlong Wei <houlong.wei@...iatek.com>, ginny.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND, PATCH v13 09/12] soc: mediatek: cmdq: define the
instruction struct
On 27/08/2019 06:12, Bibby Hsieh wrote:
>>>
>>> int cmdq_pkt_wfe(struct cmdq_pkt *pkt, u16 event)
>>> {
>>> - u32 arg_b;
>>> + struct cmdq_instruction *inst;
>>>
>>> if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_EVENT)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> - /*
>>> - * WFE arg_b
>>> - * bit 0-11: wait value
>>> - * bit 15: 1 - wait, 0 - no wait
>>> - * bit 16-27: update value
>>> - * bit 31: 1 - update, 0 - no update
>>> - */
>>
>> I have no strong opinion of CMDQ_WFE_OPTION but if you want to introduce it,
>> then please copy the comment over to include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h
>
> Ok. let's move the descriptions to header.
>>
>> Just one question, why did you call it _OPTION? It's not really expressive for me.
>
> Actually, _OPTION is come from our hardware design name...
>
Ok, then I'll stop bike-shedding. I leave it up to you to rename it or not.
Regards,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists