[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB486621458EC71973378CD5A0D1A00@AM0PR05MB4866.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 11:08:59 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
CC: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 3:59 PM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com; Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>;
> kwankhede@...dia.com; davem@...emloft.net; kvm@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mdev: Make mdev alias unique among all mdevs
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:41:17 -0500
> Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> > Mdev alias should be unique among all the mdevs, so that when such
> > alias is used by the mdev users to derive other objects, there is no
> > collision in a given system.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c index e825ff38b037..6eb37f0c6369
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> > @@ -375,6 +375,11 @@ int mdev_device_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct
> device *dev,
> > ret = -EEXIST;
> > goto mdev_fail;
> > }
> > + if (tmp->alias && strcmp(tmp->alias, alias) == 0) {
>
> Any way we can relay to the caller that the uuid was fine, but that we had a
> hash collision? Duplicate uuids are much more obvious than a collision here.
>
How do you want to relay this rare event?
Netlink interface has way to return the error message back, but sysfs is limited due to its error code based interface.
> > + mutex_unlock(&mdev_list_lock);
> > + ret = -EEXIST;
> > + goto mdev_fail;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > mdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*mdev), GFP_KERNEL);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists