[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190827121921.GD27871@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 14:19:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_RECEIVE_FINISH command
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 08:13:07PM +0000, Singh, Brijesh wrote:
> The command finalize the guest receiving process and make the SEV guest
> ready for the execution.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> ---
> .../virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst | 8 +++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
> index f0ec0cbe2aaf..b3319f0221ee 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/amd-memory-encryption.rst
> @@ -350,6 +350,14 @@ Returns: 0 on success, -negative on error
> __u32 trans_len;
> };
>
> +15. KVM_SEV_RECEIVE_FINISH
> +------------------------
> +
> +After completion of the migration flow, the KVM_SEV_RECEIVE_FINISH command can be
> +issued by the hypervisor to make the guest ready for execution.
> +
> +Returns: 0 on success, -negative on error
> +
> References
> ==========
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index ea084716f966..3089942f6630 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -7337,6 +7337,26 @@ static int sev_receive_update_data(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int sev_receive_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
> +{
> + struct kvm_sev_info *sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> + struct sev_data_receive_finish *data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!sev_guest(kvm))
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +
> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + data->handle = sev->handle;
> + ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_RECEIVE_FINISH, data, &argp->error);
> +
> + kfree(data);
> + return ret;
> +}
sev_receive_finish
sev_send_finish
sev_launch_finish
all three are almost identical. Please aggregate them into a single
__sev_send_finish_cmd() and make all three wrappers pass in the
respective SEV_CMD_*.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 247165, AG München
Powered by blists - more mailing lists