lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828035055.GA16893@magic>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:50:55 +0800
From:   Fam Zheng <fam@...hon.net>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@...edance.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        duanxiongchun@...edance.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, zhangjiachen.jc@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] bfq: Add per-device weight

On Mon, 08/26 07:59, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/26/19 12:36 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> > do you think this series could now be queued for 5.4?
> 
> The most glaring oversight in this series, is that the meat of it,
> patch #3, doesn't even have a commit message. The cover letter
> essentially looks like it should have been the commit message for
> that patch.
> 
> Please resend with acks/reviews collected, and ensure that all
> patches have a reasonable commit message.

Will do. Thanks!

Fam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ