linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] doc: kselftest: update for clarity on running kselftests in CI rings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f5088365-68a1-6036-0037-b6e9af01391f@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:17:37 -0600
From:   shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, corbet@....net
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.rue@...aro.org,
        anders.roxell@...aro.org, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: kselftest: update for clarity on running
 kselftests in CI rings

On 8/26/19 6:37 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Update to add clarity and recommendations on running newer kselftests
> on older kernels vs. matching the kernel and kselftest revisions.
> 
> The recommendation is "Match kernel revision and kselftest."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1: Fixed "WARNING: Title underline too short."

I have a few more changes and would like to make and send a v3 after
the LPC's Testing and Fuzzing kselftest discussion.

Holding off on this patch for now.

thanks,
-- Shuah