linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] leds: ti-lmu-common: Fix coccinelle issue in TI LMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3c0d26f7-52db-d0ff-e2cf-0dcc15edc67b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 22:27:24 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, pavel@....cz
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] leds: ti-lmu-common: Fix coccinelle issue in TI LMU

Hi Dan,

Thank you for the update.

On 8/28/19 5:22 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Fix the coccinelle issues found in the TI LMU common code
> 
> drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c:97:20-29: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: ramp_down < 0
> drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c:97:5-12: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: ramp_up < 0
> 
> Fixes: f717460ba4d7 ("leds: TI LMU: Add common code for TI LMU devices")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> index adc7293004f1..e294a0b097e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ti-lmu-common.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/leds-ti-lmu-common.h>
>  
> -const static int ramp_table[16] = {2048, 262000, 524000, 1049000, 2090000,
> -				4194000, 8389000, 16780000, 33550000, 41940000,
> -				50330000, 58720000, 67110000, 83880000,
> -				100660000, 117440000};
> +const static unsigned int ramp_table[16] = {2048, 262000, 524000, 1049000,
> +				2090000, 4194000, 8389000, 16780000, 33550000,
> +				41940000, 50330000, 58720000, 67110000,
> +				83880000, 100660000, 117440000};
>  
>  static int ti_lmu_common_update_brightness(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank,
>  					   int brightness)
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ int ti_lmu_common_set_brightness(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank, int brightness)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ti_lmu_common_set_brightness);
>  
> -static int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
> +static unsigned int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
>  {
>  	int size = ARRAY_SIZE(ramp_table);
>  	int i;
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int usec)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int ti_lmu_common_set_ramp(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank)
> @@ -94,9 +94,6 @@ int ti_lmu_common_set_ramp(struct ti_lmu_bank *lmu_bank)
>  		ramp_down = ti_lmu_common_convert_ramp_to_index(lmu_bank->ramp_down_usec);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (ramp_up < 0 || ramp_down < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	ramp = (ramp_up << 4) | ramp_down;
>  
>  	return regmap_write(regmap, lmu_bank->runtime_ramp_reg, ramp);
> 

I've applied the patch but amended SHA1 in the Fixes tag - in mainline
it is 3fce8e1eb994.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski