[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908282352470.1938@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 23:54:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc: x86@...nel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: [patch V3 1/2] x86/mm/pti: Handle unaligned address gracefully in
pti_clone_pagetable()
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
pti_clone_pmds() assumes that the supplied address is either:
- properly PUD/PMD aligned
or
- the address is actually mapped which means that independently
of the mapping level (PUD/PMD/PTE) the next higher mapping
exists.
If that's not the case the unaligned address can be incremented by PUD or
PMD size incorrectly. All callers supply mapped and/or aligned addresses,
but for the sake of robustness it's better to handle that case properly and
to emit a warning.
[ tglx: Rewrote changelog and added WARN_ON_ONCE() ]
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
V2: Negate P[UM]D_MASK for checking whether the offset part is 0
V3: Fix changelog
---
arch/x86/mm/pti.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pti.c
@@ -330,13 +330,15 @@ pti_clone_pgtable(unsigned long start, u
pud = pud_offset(p4d, addr);
if (pud_none(*pud)) {
- addr += PUD_SIZE;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(addr & ~PUD_MASK);
+ addr = round_up(addr + 1, PUD_SIZE);
continue;
}
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
if (pmd_none(*pmd)) {
- addr += PMD_SIZE;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(addr & ~PMD_MASK);
+ addr = round_up(addr + 1, PMD_SIZE);
continue;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists