linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] rpmsg: core: add API to get message length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7dc4d1cf-4f15-19ab-b8dd-424175f2a11a@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:34:10 -0500
From:   Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:     Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
        Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        xiang xiao <xiaoxiang781216@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] rpmsg: core: add API to get message length

Hi Arnaud,

On 8/28/19 10:19 AM, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> Return the rpmsg buffer size for sending message, so rpmsg users
> can split a long message in several sub rpmsg buffers.

Thanks for the patch, I also have a need for the same to be able to
compute permissible payload size. Minor comments below.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
> ---
> V4 to V5 :
>   - rename rpmsg_get_buf_payload_size to rpmsg_get_mtu
> 
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c       | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h   |  2 ++
>  drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/rpmsg.h            | 10 ++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index 8122807db380..daca2e24fc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,27 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_trysend_offchannel);
>  
> +/**
> + * rpmsg_get_mtu() - get maximum transmission buffer size for sending message.
> + * @ept: the rpmsg endpoint
> + *
> + * This function returns maximum buffer size available for a single message.
> + *
> + * Return: the maximum transmission size on success and an appropriate error
> + * value on failure.
> + */
> +
> +ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> +{
> +	if (WARN_ON(!ept))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (!ept->ops->get_buf_mtu)

How about calling the ops just get_mtu or rename the function to follow
the ops name, like all the others.

> +		return -ENXIO;

Perhaps ENOTSUPP or EOPNOTSUPP.

> +
> +	return ept->ops->get_buf_mtu(ept);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_get_mtu);
> +
>  /*
>   * match an rpmsg channel with a channel info struct.
>   * this is used to make sure we're not creating rpmsg devices for channels
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> index 0d791c30b7ea..645c402569ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_internal.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct rpmsg_device_ops {
>   * @trysend:		see @rpmsg_trysend(), required
>   * @trysendto:		see @rpmsg_trysendto(), optional
>   * @trysend_offchannel:	see @rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(), optional
> + * @get_buf_payload_size: see @rpmsg_get_buf_payload_size(), optional

Missed updating the kerneldoc to the new name.

>   *
>   * Indirection table for the operations that a rpmsg backend should implement.
>   * In addition to @destroy_ept, the backend must at least implement @send and
> @@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops {
>  			     void *data, int len);
>  	__poll_t (*poll)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp,
>  			     poll_table *wait);
> +	ssize_t (*get_buf_mtu)(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept);
>  };
>  
>  int rpmsg_register_device(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> index e757f0038a1c..f80b1ad23e7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_trysendto(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data,
>  				  int len, u32 dst);
>  static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src,
>  					   u32 dst, void *data, int len);
> +static ssize_t virtio_get_buf_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept);

Minor nit, virtio_rpmsg_ prefix similar to all the other ops.

regards
Suman

>  
>  static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops virtio_endpoint_ops = {
>  	.destroy_ept = virtio_rpmsg_destroy_ept,
> @@ -187,6 +188,7 @@ static const struct rpmsg_endpoint_ops virtio_endpoint_ops = {
>  	.trysend = virtio_rpmsg_trysend,
>  	.trysendto = virtio_rpmsg_trysendto,
>  	.trysend_offchannel = virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel,
> +	.get_buf_mtu = virtio_get_buf_mtu,
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -702,6 +704,14 @@ static int virtio_rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src,
>  	return rpmsg_send_offchannel_raw(rpdev, src, dst, data, len, false);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t virtio_get_buf_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> +{
> +	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = ept->rpdev;
> +	struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> +
> +	return vch->vrp->buf_size - sizeof(struct rpmsg_hdr);
> +}
> +
>  static int rpmsg_recv_single(struct virtproc_info *vrp, struct device *dev,
>  			     struct rpmsg_hdr *msg, unsigned int len)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg.h b/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> index 9fe156d1c018..9d638bf2bdce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg.h
> @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ int rpmsg_trysend_offchannel(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, u32 src, u32 dst,
>  __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, struct file *filp,
>  			poll_table *wait);
>  
> +ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept);
> +
>  #else
>  
>  static inline int register_rpmsg_device(struct rpmsg_device *dev)
> @@ -242,6 +244,14 @@ static inline __poll_t rpmsg_poll(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t rpmsg_get_mtu(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
> +{
> +	/* This shouldn't be possible */
> +	WARN_ON(1);
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPMSG) */
>  
>  /* use a macro to avoid include chaining to get THIS_MODULE */
>