linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: Enable driver and firmware hints to control power at probe time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jmsPO5m2zBV3_j8LgqQ2Uj6euXUCJgT74L93hZP9nP_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:55:42 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: Enable driver and firmware hints to control
 power at probe time

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:34 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 01:32:00PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:43:43AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> > > > index 6717adee33f01..4bc0ea4a3201a 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/device.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> > > > @@ -248,6 +248,12 @@ enum probe_type {
> > > >   * @owner:       The module owner.
> > > >   * @mod_name:    Used for built-in modules.
> > > >   * @suppress_bind_attrs: Disables bind/unbind via sysfs.
> > > > + * @probe_low_power: The driver supports its probe function being called while
> > > > + *                    the device is in a low power state, independently of the
> > > > + *                    expected behaviour on combination of a given bus and
> > > > + *                    firmware interface etc. The driver is responsible for
> > > > + *                    powering the device on using runtime PM in such case.
> > > > + *                    This configuration has no effect if CONFIG_PM is disabled.
> > > >   * @probe_type:  Type of the probe (synchronous or asynchronous) to use.
> > > >   * @of_match_table: The open firmware table.
> > > >   * @acpi_match_table: The ACPI match table.
> > > > @@ -285,6 +291,7 @@ struct device_driver {
> > > >   const char              *mod_name;      /* used for built-in modules */
> > > >
> > > >   bool suppress_bind_attrs;       /* disables bind/unbind via sysfs */
> > > > + bool probe_low_power;
> > >
> > > Ick, no, this should be a bus-specific thing to handle such messed up
> > > hardware.  Why polute this in the driver core?
> >
> > The alternative could be to make it I²C specific indeed; the vast majority
> > of camera sensors are I²C devices these days.
>
> Why is this even needed to be a bus/device attribute at all?  You are
> checking the firmware property in the probe function, just do the logic
> there as you are, what needs to be saved to the bus's logic?

The situation today is that all devices are put into D0 by the ACPI
layer before driver probing since drivers generally expect devices to
be in D0 when their probe routines run.  If the driver is prepared to
cope with devices in low-power states, though, powering them up before
probing for a driver may not be necessary, but still the core (or
generally the code invoking the driver probe) needs to know that the
driver really is prepared for that.  Hence the driver flag AFAICS.

Now, in theory there may be some platform requirements regarding the
power states of devices during driver probe, although admittedly it is
not entirely clear to me why that would be the case) and hence the
property.  I would think that if the driver could cope with devices in
low-power states during probe, the platform wouldn't need to worry
about that.