[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828093338.29446-1-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:33:35 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>,
Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] f2fs: fix extent corrupotion during directIO in LFS mode
In LFS mode, por_fsstress testcase reports a bug as below:
[ASSERT] (fsck_chk_inode_blk: 931) --> ino: 0x12fe has wrong ext: [pgofs:142, blk:215424, len:16]
Since commit f847c699cff3 ("f2fs: allow out-place-update for direct
IO in LFS mode"), we start to allow OPU mode for direct IO, however,
we missed to update extent cache in __allocate_data_block(), finally,
it cause extent field being inconsistent with physical block address,
fix it.
Fixes: f847c699cff3 ("f2fs: allow out-place-update for direct IO in LFS mode")
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index bf648c8c50ad..727df32382c6 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ static int __allocate_data_block(struct dnode_of_data *dn, int seg_type)
if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr) != NULL_SEGNO)
invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
old_blkaddr, old_blkaddr);
- f2fs_set_data_blkaddr(dn);
+ f2fs_update_data_blkaddr(dn, dn->data_blkaddr);
/*
* i_size will be updated by direct_IO. Otherwise, we'll get stale
--
2.18.0.rc1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists