[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90e78ce8-d46a-5154-c324-a05aa1743c98@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:37:01 +0800
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, michel@...nzer.net,
lkp@...org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [drm/mgag200] 90f479ae51: vm-scalability.median -18.8%
regression
Hi Thomas,
On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
>> Both patches have little impact on the performance from our side.
> Thanks for testing. Too bad they doesn't solve the issue.
>
> There's another patch attached. Could you please tests this as well?
> Thanks a lot!
>
> The patch comes from Daniel Vetter after discussing the problem on IRC.
> The idea of the patch is that the old mgag200 code might display much
> less frames that the generic code, because mgag200 only prints from
> non-atomic context. If we simulate this with the generic code, we should
> see roughly the original performance.
>
>
It's cool, the patch "usecansleep.patch" can fix the issue.
commit:
f1f8555dfb9 drm/bochs: Use shadow buffer for bochs framebuffer console
90f479ae51a drm/mgag200: Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic
framebuffer emulation
b976b04c2bc only schedule worker from non-atomic context
f1f8555dfb9a70a2 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde b976b04c2bcf33148d6c7bc1a2
testcase/testparams/testbox
---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
---------------------------
%stddev change %stddev change %stddev
\ | \ | \
42912 -15% 36517 44093
vm-scalability/performance-300s-8T-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb/lkp-knm01
42912 -15% 36517 44093 GEO-MEAN
vm-scalability.median
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists