[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190828095546.GA38321@google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:55:46 +0100
From: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
arnd@...db.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hpa@...or.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, lucas.de.marchi@...il.com,
maco@...roid.com, maco@...gle.com, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
mingo@...hat.com, oneukum@...e.com, pombredanne@...b.com,
sam@...nborg.org, sspatil@...gle.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de, usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
x86@...nel.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] modpost: add support for symbol namespaces
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:43:26AM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>+++ Matthias Maennich [27/08/19 15:41 +0100]:
>>On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 06:21:38PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>>+++ Matthias Maennich [21/08/19 12:49 +0100]:
>>>>Add support for symbols that are exported into namespaces. For that,
>>>>extract any namespace suffix from the symbol name. In addition, emit a
>>>>warning whenever a module refers to an exported symbol without
>>>>explicitly importing the namespace that it is defined in. This patch
>>>>consistently adds the namespace suffix to symbol names exported into
>>>>Module.symvers.
>>>>
>>>>Example warning emitted by modpost in case of the above violation:
>>>>
>>>>WARNING: module ums-usbat uses symbol usb_stor_resume from namespace
>>>>USB_STORAGE, but does not import it.
>>>>
>>>>Co-developed-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
>>>>Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>>>>Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@...gle.com>
>>>>---
>>>>scripts/mod/modpost.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>scripts/mod/modpost.h | 7 ++++
>>>>2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
>>>>index f277e116e0eb..538bb24ffee3 100644
>>>>--- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
>>>>+++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
>>>>@@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct symbol {
>>>> struct module *module;
>>>> unsigned int crc;
>>>> int crc_valid;
>>>>+ const char *namespace;
>>>> unsigned int weak:1;
>>>> unsigned int vmlinux:1; /* 1 if symbol is defined in vmlinux */
>>>> unsigned int kernel:1; /* 1 if symbol is from kernel
>>>>@@ -233,6 +234,37 @@ static struct symbol *find_symbol(const char *name)
>>>> return NULL;
>>>>}
>>>>
>>>>+static bool contains_namespace(struct namespace_list *list,
>>>>+ const char *namespace)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct namespace_list *ns_entry;
>>>>+
>>>>+ for (ns_entry = list; ns_entry != NULL; ns_entry = ns_entry->next)
>>>>+ if (strcmp(ns_entry->namespace, namespace) == 0)
>>>>+ return true;
>>>>+
>>>>+ return false;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static void add_namespace(struct namespace_list **list, const char *namespace)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ struct namespace_list *ns_entry;
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (!contains_namespace(*list, namespace)) {
>>>>+ ns_entry = NOFAIL(malloc(sizeof(struct namespace_list) +
>>>>+ strlen(namespace) + 1));
>>>>+ strcpy(ns_entry->namespace, namespace);
>>>>+ ns_entry->next = *list;
>>>>+ *list = ns_entry;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>+static bool module_imports_namespace(struct module *module,
>>>>+ const char *namespace)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ return contains_namespace(module->imported_namespaces, namespace);
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>static const struct {
>>>> const char *str;
>>>> enum export export;
>>>>@@ -312,6 +344,22 @@ static enum export export_from_sec(struct elf_info *elf, unsigned int sec)
>>>> return export_unknown;
>>>>}
>>>>
>>>>+static const char *sym_extract_namespace(const char **symname)
>>>>+{
>>>>+ size_t n;
>>>>+ char *dupsymname;
>>>>+
>>>>+ n = strcspn(*symname, ".");
>>>>+ if (n < strlen(*symname) - 1) {
>>>>+ dupsymname = NOFAIL(strdup(*symname));
>>>>+ dupsymname[n] = '\0';
>>>>+ *symname = dupsymname;
>>>>+ return dupsymname + n + 1;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>>+ return NULL;
>>>>+}
>>>>+
>>>>/**
>>>>* Add an exported symbol - it may have already been added without a
>>>>* CRC, in this case just update the CRC
>>>>@@ -319,16 +367,18 @@ static enum export export_from_sec(struct elf_info *elf, unsigned int sec)
>>>>static struct symbol *sym_add_exported(const char *name, struct module *mod,
>>>> enum export export)
>>>>{
>>>>- struct symbol *s = find_symbol(name);
>>>>+ const char *symbol_name = name;
>>>>+ const char *namespace = sym_extract_namespace(&symbol_name);
>>>>+ struct symbol *s = find_symbol(symbol_name);
>>>>
>>>> if (!s) {
>>>>- s = new_symbol(name, mod, export);
>>>>+ s = new_symbol(symbol_name, mod, export);
>>>>+ s->namespace = namespace;
>>>> } else {
>>>> if (!s->preloaded) {
>>>>- warn("%s: '%s' exported twice. Previous export "
>>>>- "was in %s%s\n", mod->name, name,
>>>>- s->module->name,
>>>>- is_vmlinux(s->module->name) ?"":".ko");
>>>>+ warn("%s: '%s' exported twice. Previous export was in %s%s\n",
>>>>+ mod->name, symbol_name, s->module->name,
>>>>+ is_vmlinux(s->module->name) ? "" : ".ko");
>>>> } else {
>>>> /* In case Module.symvers was out of date */
>>>> s->module = mod;
>>>>@@ -1943,6 +1993,7 @@ static void read_symbols(const char *modname)
>>>> const char *symname;
>>>> char *version;
>>>> char *license;
>>>>+ char *namespace;
>>>> struct module *mod;
>>>> struct elf_info info = { };
>>>> Elf_Sym *sym;
>>>>@@ -1974,6 +2025,12 @@ static void read_symbols(const char *modname)
>>>> license = get_next_modinfo(&info, "license", license);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>+ namespace = get_modinfo(&info, "import_ns");
>>>>+ while (namespace) {
>>>>+ add_namespace(&mod->imported_namespaces, namespace);
>>>>+ namespace = get_next_modinfo(&info, "import_ns", namespace);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>> for (sym = info.symtab_start; sym < info.symtab_stop; sym++) {
>>>> symname = remove_dot(info.strtab + sym->st_name);
>>>>
>>>>@@ -2118,6 +2175,13 @@ static int check_exports(struct module *mod)
>>>> basename++;
>>>> else
>>>> basename = mod->name;
>>>>+
>>>>+ if (exp->namespace &&
>>>>+ !module_imports_namespace(mod, exp->namespace)) {
>>>>+ warn("module %s uses symbol %s from namespace %s, but does not import it.\n",
>>>>+ basename, exp->name, exp->namespace);
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>> if (!mod->gpl_compatible)
>>>> check_for_gpl_usage(exp->export, basename, exp->name);
>>>> check_for_unused(exp->export, basename, exp->name);
>>>>@@ -2395,16 +2459,21 @@ static void write_dump(const char *fname)
>>>>{
>>>> struct buffer buf = { };
>>>> struct symbol *symbol;
>>>>+ const char *namespace;
>>>> int n;
>>>>
>>>> for (n = 0; n < SYMBOL_HASH_SIZE ; n++) {
>>>> symbol = symbolhash[n];
>>>> while (symbol) {
>>>>- if (dump_sym(symbol))
>>>>- buf_printf(&buf, "0x%08x\t%s\t%s\t%s\n",
>>>>- symbol->crc, symbol->name,
>>>>- symbol->module->name,
>>>>- export_str(symbol->export));
>>>>+ if (dump_sym(symbol)) {
>>>>+ namespace = symbol->namespace;
>>>>+ buf_printf(&buf, "0x%08x\t%s%s%s\t%s\t%s\n",
>>>>+ symbol->crc, symbol->name,
>>>>+ namespace ? "." : "",
>>>>+ namespace ? namespace : "",
>>>
>>>I think it might be cleaner to just have namespace be a separate
>>>field in Module.symvers, rather than appending a dot and the
>>>namespace at the end of a symbol name. Maybe something like
>>>
>>> <crc> <symbol_name> <namespace> <module>
>>>
>>>For symbols without a namespace, we could just have "", with all
>>>fields delimited by tabs. This is just a stylistic suggestion, what do
>>>you think?
>>
>>I thought of something like that initially, but did not do it to not
>>break users of this file. But as I am anyway breaking users by changing
>>the symbol name into symbol.NS, I might as well do it as you suggested.
>>Since read_dump() also knew already how to extract the namespaces from
>>symbol.NS, it had already worked without a change to the reading code
>>of modpost. Are there any other consumers of Module.symvers that we
>>should be aware of?
>
>Maybe we can ease any possible breakage caused by the new format by
>putting the namespace column last? Then the first 4 fields crc,
>symbol, module, export type will remain in the same order, with
>namespace last. In-tree, I think we would need to update
>scripts/export_report.pl.
>
>kmod is likely to be affected too - Lucas, would the addition of a new
>field (in the order described above) in Module.symvers break any kmod tools?
>
According to the comment right above read_dump() and having a look a the
implementation of it, the format is
0x12345678<tab>symbol<tab>module[[<tab>export]<tab>something]
So, independently of what 'something' is, also export seems to be
optional. OTOH, write_dump() seems to consistently write
0x12345678<tab>symbol<tab>module<tab>export
Not sure if there is something modifying Module.symvers afterwards or
whether this is something that historically needs to be supported, but
if we could rule that out, I would prefer
0x12345678<tab>symbol<tab>namespace<tab>module<tab>export
as you initially suggested.
Cheers,
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists