[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <156698738395.5720.15487838071767605987.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 10:16:23 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless return value check
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5405d0051f7ca820d1781d87baf4d730ff58f208
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5405d0051f7ca820d1781d87baf4d730ff58f208
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 21:08:59 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 11:50:30 +02:00
posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless return value check
set_process_cpu_timer() checks already whether the clock id is valid. No
point in checking the return value of the sample function. That allows to
simplify the sample function later.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190821192920.339725769@linutronix.de
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index aff7e3b..5944b74 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -1190,14 +1190,13 @@ void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned int clock_idx,
u64 *newval, u64 *oldval)
{
u64 now;
- int ret;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(clock_idx >= CPUCLOCK_SCHED))
return;
- ret = cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true);
+ cpu_clock_sample_group(clock_idx, tsk, &now, true);
- if (oldval && ret != -EINVAL) {
+ if (oldval) {
/*
* We are setting itimer. The *oldval is absolute and we update
* it to be relative, *newval argument is relative and we update
Powered by blists - more mailing lists