lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:23:40 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc:     mike.kravetz@...cle.com, shuah@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        khalid.aziz@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        mkoutny@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] hugetlb_cgroup: Add hugetlb_cgroup reservation
 limits

On Mon 26-08-19 16:32:34, Mina Almasry wrote:
>  mm/hugetlb.c                                  | 493 ++++++++++++------
>  mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c                           | 187 +++++--

This is a lot of changes to an already subtle code which hugetlb
reservations undoubly are. Moreover cgroupv1 is feature frozen and I am
not aware of any plans to port the controller to v2. That all doesn't
sound in favor of this change. Mike is the maintainer of the hugetlb
code so I will defer to him to make a decision but I wouldn't recommend
that.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ