lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <496b3d09-47a2-3836-2899-d964267993d3@linux.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:41:43 +0300
From:   Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: coccinelle: check for !(un)?likely usage


> 
> As a human I am confused. Is !likely(x) equivalent to x or !x?
> 
> Julia
> 

As far as I could understand it:

# define likely(x)	__builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)

!likely(x)
!__builtin_expect(!!(x), 1)
!((!!(x)) == 1)
(!!(x)) != 1, since !! could result in 0 or 1
(!!(x)) == 0
!(!!(x))
!!!(x)
!(x)

Thanks,
Denis

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ